My dilemma

See, I don't like Paul Wolfowitz, so if he were fired from the World Bank for petty corruption -- or trying to muddy climate science -- that would make me happy, because anything that makes Paul Wolfowitz sad is, odds are, going to make me smile.

And yet, I don't like the World Bank much either. So if Wolfowitz stays, and that makes the World Bank less effective than it already is, that's also a plus in my book.

I think of what Henry Kissinger said of the Iran-Iraq war: Isn't there some way they can both lose?