Raising the age of consent to 16 will keep more minors from being exploited without penalty in the sex trade, or by neighbourhood perverts. It will, however, face fierce opposition from the homosexual lobby, who want the age of consent for homosexual acts dropped to 14, and perhaps even follow the example of the Netherlands, the effective age is 12 if the child consents.So nice to know that Conservatives still think all queers are kid-diddlers, too.
Funny, I don't see the clergy of the Catholic Church coming out for a lower age of consent, and there's a higher statistical correlation there.
Skippy has more on this bigot's idiocy.
BTW, the "fierce" "homosexual lobby" wants the age of consent for homosexuality to be the same as the age for heterosexuality, dumbass.
2 comments:
Exactly. It is currently 14 for heterosexual acts.
Parliament has already rejected a bill to raise the age of consent to 16.
S. 159 of the Criminal Code prohibiting anal intercourse where one or both persons are under 18 has already been declared unconstitutional by the Quebec and Ontario Courts of Appeal.
So it appears that the general trend of legal reform favours reducing the age of consent to homosexual acts to 14.
EGALE's submission in 2000 to the Department of Justice on this issue appears to at least favour it as well, if only tentatively.
And you're opposed to equality for homosexuals, right?
That's what we're talking about. EGALE wants equality, not young flesh for the fun of it.
Post a Comment