Steve Gilliard writes that Sen. Graham was referring not to slavery, but to the destruction of Sherman's army in South Carolina. I'm inclined to believe Steve, with two caveats:
1) Graham could have specified what he was speaking about easily. The GOP has a long history of using ambiguous doublespeak ("state's rights", anyone?) to speak to the racists in their base - even if Graham was talking about a legitimate grievance, he was doing it in a way that obviously was communicating to them.
2) It doesn't mean Graham's not a pussy. One. Hundred. And Forty. Years. Ago. Get over it, ladies.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment