tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9560953.post1321318847979918683..comments2023-12-31T19:34:14.853-05:00Comments on Dymaxion World: It's been a while since I've put some terrible news up on this thingjohnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09690430991814528863noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9560953.post-6211620343559752012010-03-13T16:33:57.972-05:002010-03-13T16:33:57.972-05:00Hi JOhn. You are probably right about meat eating ...Hi JOhn. You are probably right about meat eating and auto obsessed having to change, though we can afford to phase cars out slowly in places that are really dependent on them if we do everything else right. But 3,000 square foot homes? Wasteful and unneeded, and counterproductive. But that is something that is sustainable. 3,000 square foot homes are even compatible with sustainable communities, as long as people don't mind shared walls, and don't insist on their own yards. Actually the having your own yard obession is what really may be unsustainable, unless people are willing to settle for really small homes or really small yards. So trade off. Small home, big yard. Moderate home, tiny yard. Or home any size you want and shared walls and shared yards.Gar Lipowhttp://www.nohairshirts.comnoreply@blogger.com