tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9560953.post114676554255640007..comments2023-12-31T19:34:14.853-05:00Comments on Dymaxion World: Sometimes You Don't Get The Jokejohnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09690430991814528863noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9560953.post-1146797598545182062006-05-04T22:53:00.000-04:002006-05-04T22:53:00.000-04:00This joke:http://funny-joke-article.blogspot.com/This joke:<BR/>http://funny-joke-article.blogspot.com/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9560953.post-1146778739579313332006-05-04T17:38:00.000-04:002006-05-04T17:38:00.000-04:00Not this idiot again.That's a terrible definition ...Not this idiot again.<BR/><BR/>That's a terrible definition of rudeness. By that criteria, a newspaper film criticism is arguably "rude".<BR/><BR/>John Rogers, who also happens to be a stand-up comedian, <A HREF="http://kfmonkey.blogspot.com/2006/05/why-tell-jokes.html" REL="nofollow">made the point</A> that if Colbert <I>wasn't</I> being rude, then he wouldn't have been doing his job as a comedian. John Rogers also goes on to point out that the rudeness in this case did nothing to attack Bush personally -- everything Colbert used was public known facts regarding Bush's role as President.<BR/><BR/>Furthermore, for an effective democracy, I'd like to think that the one person who ought to be confronted with such "rudeness", actively and oftenly, is the leader of the government.<BR/><BR/>No possible consequence could have befallen Colbert? Come on; he books <I>those people</I> for his show all the time. By doing this, he attracted a lot of attention to himself that could create serious problems for filling the all-important guest slot on his show.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com